This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:27:49 -0600
Subject: Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
References: <e394668d0909031450te808c15h87a2f884b38a7281@mail.gmail.com> <200909032303.56901.pedro@codesourcery.com> <e394668d0909031517m59f957c3l30f20291d4f352f0@mail.gmail.com> <20090903234357.GR29075@codesourcery.com> <m3vdjy8kvx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090904212804.GA28036@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

Daniel> I *think* so - the frame ID would only be consulted if there were
Daniel> registers.  I assume we can't get here when the inferior is not
Daniel> running, since we're passed a frame.  Or is that overly optimistic?

No, I think you are correct.
Thanks for the reassurance.

Tom

References:
- store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: store.exp failure on i686-linux with newer gcc's
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]