This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.

From: Jim Ingham <jingham at apple dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:12:15 -0800
Subject: Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
References: <27535106.post@talk.nabble.com> <27542787.post@talk.nabble.com> <m3ocjvsll2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1CF86F7D-0B47-47D7-A6E2-24853D50653D@apple.com> <20100211190921.GA20235@caradoc.them.org>

Hey, cool.  Our gdb's been doing that for a couple of years now, glad you caught up :-D

Jim

On Feb 11, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:03:08AM -0800, Jim Ingham wrote:
>> It sounds like the STL code got inlined?  Then next would also step
>> in, since gdb doesn't see inlined functions as new frames.
> 
> Maybe your GDB doesn't :-P  GDB 7.0 does support inlined functions -
> if your compiler outputs correct DWARF, at least.
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: mweglicki8208

References:
- GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: mweglicki8208
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: mweglicki8208
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: Jim Ingham
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]