This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Can the debugger get the sigaction table of the debugee?

From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
To: forandom at gmail dot com
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:50:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Can the debugger get the sigaction table of the debugee?
References: <77f815bd1003232054w5b8ea922tea330cb6300e14bf@mail.gmail.com> <77f815bd1003241923m5bd1f055la0999a7dec76dc1e@mail.gmail.com>

> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:23:39 +0800
> From: xingxing pan <forandom@gmail.com>
> 
> Can anyone help?
> 
> 2010/3/24 xingxing pan <forandom@gmail.com>:
> > Can the debugger get the sigaction table of the debugee? when the user
> > wanna know the handler function of a specific signal.
> > It seems GDB can only get the siginfo struct through the syscall ptrace.
> >
> > Thank you.

None of the Unix-like kernels that that I'm familliar with expose this
information.  Therefore, GDB cannot show it.

References:
- Can the debugger get the sigaction table of the debugee?
  - From: xingxing pan
- Re: Can the debugger get the sigaction table of the debugee?
  - From: xingxing pan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]