This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?

On 02/06/12 21:10, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:47:22 +0200, Russell Shaw wrote:
A friend said when he was using the full STL, the delay was 8 seconds. 

This is too vague claim.  Which hardware he used?  Why was full STL used by
a single CU?  Was he using gold?  And its incremental linking?

I don't know. The fact that it can happen is just something to be aware of.

He was using in a mingw or whatever environment on a windows XP box which probably doesn't help either.

Wouldn't there be far more existing GDB contributors that would
understand C++'ified gdb libraries, than C++ coders that know
anything about the internals of gdb?

It is a good question, my assumptions sure may be wrong.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]