This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Matt Rice <ratmice at gmail dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb at sourceware dot org, tromey at redhat dot com, yao at codesourcery dot com
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:57:28 +0100
Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?
References: <20120330161403.GA17891@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87aa2rjkb8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F8FD047.6030702@codesourcery.com> <20121204141708.GA28600@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201212041444.qB4EiG4L025312@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20121204145144.GA30509@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CACTLOFof0v6NJe8WemS--Q3iMSXjHciwASxBAED5ki3scaNZuw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:39:27 +0100, Matt Rice wrote:
> k, will go ahead and get started on this i've always felt we should at
> least do -Wc++-compat

That would be great, thanks.

In fact I do not see any possible technical reason against -Wc++-compat, it
has no disadvantages (just possibly "needless" many mechanical changes of your
patch).

Jan

References:
- Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?
  - From: Matt Rice

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]