This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: document issue about GDB/MI output syntax
- From: asmwarrior <asmwarrior at gmail dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: GDB Development <gdb at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:24:13 +0800
- Subject: Re: document issue about GDB/MI output syntax
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52B2A623 dot 2070009 at gmail dot com> <20131219180743 dot GJ26143 at adacore dot com>
On 2013-12-20 2:07, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Hi, I just found in this page:
>> https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/GDB_002fMI-Output-Syntax.html#GDB_002fMI-Output-Syntax
>> The syntax is not correct:
>>
>> console-stream-output ==>
>> "~" c-string
>> target-stream-output ==>
>> "@" c-string
>> log-stream-output ==>
>> "&" c-string
>>
>> It should be:
>>
>> console-stream-output ==>
>> "~" c-string nl
>> target-stream-output ==>
>> "@" c-string nl
>> log-stream-output ==>
>> "&" c-string nl
>>
>> There is a "nl" missing in those stream-record, right?
>
> I haven't verified with actual behavior, but something doesn't
> look right indeed.
Here is the log I start gdb in MI under Windows
E:\code\opencv\debugxb>gdb --interpreter=mi
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
~"GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.50.20131219-cvs\n"
~"Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n"
~"License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>\
nThis is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\nThere is NO
WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type \"show copying\"\nand \"show wa
rranty\" for details.\n"
~"This GDB was configured as \"mingw32\".\nType \"show configuration\" for confi
guration details."
~"\nFor bug reporting instructions, please see:\n"
~"<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.\n"
~"Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:\n<http://www.
gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.\n"
~"For help, type \"help\".\n"
~"Type \"apropos word\" to search for commands related to \"word\".\n"
(gdb)
You see there are "nl"s after each line of GDB's message.
However, I am wondering if we shouldn't
> put the "nl" at the end of each [...]-record rule. Looking
> at the grammar as currently written, I think we have issues
> with other records.
>
I think the "nl" can be put in a high level rule. E.g.
out-of-band-record ==>
(async-record | stream-record) "nl"
I'm not sure the above grammar is in correct format, just put the "nl" in the end of out-of-band-record.
Yuanhui Zhang