This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Patchwork patch tracking system
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat dot com>, Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:07:32 -0600
- Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140402100842 dot GA956 at blade dot nx> <533F3713 dot 40700 at earthlink dot net> <20140417135040 dot GA891 at blade dot nx> <20140422130652 dot GG5790 at adacore dot com>
Joel> There is a tool that we use internally at AdaCore which I was starting
Joel> to think of proposing for GDB, called geritt. From what I have been
Joel> able to see from patchwork's webpage, geritt seems like a much more
Joel> advanced system compared to patchwork. But the tradeoff is that using
Joel> geritt requires a bit more work as well, and that part or all of
Joel> the review process would happen on geritt, rather than the mailing-list.
Joel> It's not very intuitive at first, but it is very easy and lightweight.
I was keen on gerrit until I read this:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg00232.html
Maybe phabricator is better for our needs?
I've been trying the patchworks install as well. I don't find it all
that useful myself, but maybe it would be better if more people were
using it.
Tom