This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug nptl/378] posix_spawn implementation, use vfork/execve rather than fork/execve for NPTL Linux.
- From: "jakub at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 13 Sep 2004 06:35:11 -0000
- Subject: [Bug nptl/378] posix_spawn implementation, use vfork/execve rather than fork/execve for NPTL Linux.
- References: <20040910004801.378.dennis@mds.rmit.edu.au>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2004-09-13 06:35 -------
But similarly any developer that relies on the atfork handlers not being called
is creating a non-portable program.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/posix_spawn.html
^[THR] [Option Start] It is implementation-defined whether the fork handlers are
run when posix_spawn() or posix_spawnp() is called. [Option End]
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.