This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug admin/1907] Changes to posix/wordexp.c (exec_comm_child) missing in 2.3.6 tarball?
- From: "ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 22 Nov 2005 05:53:14 -0000
- Subject: [Bug admin/1907] Changes to posix/wordexp.c (exec_comm_child) missing in 2.3.6 tarball?
- References: <20051122050812.1907.ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au 2005-11-22 05:53 -------
I must be missing something; for example stdio.h has a 2.3.6 tag much earlier
than I would have expected too, on revision 30 when I would have expected the
tag to fall on revision 34 given the dates of release
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/include/stdio.h?cvsroot=glibc
How is it decided where the tag applies?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.