This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/2449] New: adjtime() does not update oldelta if delta is NULL
- From: "michael dot kerrisk at gmx dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 12 Mar 2006 22:25:38 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/2449] New: adjtime() does not update oldelta if delta is NULL
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
According to 'info adjtime', if the OLDDELTA argument is not a NULL
pointer, then adjtime() returns information about any previous time
adjustment that has not yet completed.
However, this is only done if DELTA is non-NULL (i.e., we
are also changing the adjustment). If we want to simply retrieve
the current delta without changing it (as the info man page implies
we can), then specifying 'DELTA' as NULL does not cause the
remaining delta to be returned in OLDDELTA.
I believe the problem actually lies in the kernel, where the
following patch should fix things:
--- time.c.orig 2006-03-12 11:03:10.000000000 +1300
+++ time.c 2006-03-12 11:04:26.000000000 +1300
@@ -375,7 +375,9 @@
/* p. 24, (d) */
result = TIME_ERROR;
- if ((txc->modes & ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT) == ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT)
+ if(txc->modes == 0)
+ txc->offset = time_adjust;
+ else if ((txc->modes & ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT) == ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT)
txc->offset = save_adjust;
else {
txc->offset = shift_right(time_offset, SHIFT_UPDATE);
However, I submit this against glibc, because it is the (more portable)
glibc adjtime() interface that is (IMO) broken by this problem. If you
agree that this is the needed fix you can either push it to the
kernel folk, or ask me to do so.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Summary: adjtime() does not update oldelta if delta is NULL
Product: glibc
Version: 2.4
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: michael dot kerrisk at gmx dot net
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2449
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.