This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/4943] Inconsistent rounding behaviour for sprintf and IEEE doubles
- From: "vincent+libc at vinc17 dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 3 Oct 2007 15:26:13 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/4943] Inconsistent rounding behaviour for sprintf and IEEE doubles
- References: <20070820142205.4943.paul@inet.co.za>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From vincent+libc at vinc17 dot org 2007-10-03 15:26 -------
(In reply to comment #41)
> Hint: "Paragraph 2: Conversions involving IEC 60559 formats follow all
> pertinent recommended practice. In particular, conversion between any
> supported IEC 60559 format and decimal with DECIMAL_DIG or fewer significant
> digits is correctly rounded, which assures that conversion from the widest
> supported IEC 60559 format to decimal with DECIMAL_DIG digits and back is the
> identity function."
I agree with that. But note that this paragraph says that:
base 2 -> base 10 -> base 2
must be the identity function. Of course, this doesn't apply to:
base 10 -> base 2 -> base 10
> x = 9.074439913906690
> printf("%.15f", x);
> 9.074439913906691
This is a "base 10 -> base 2 -> base 10" conversion sequence.
If you want "base 10 -> base 2 -> base 10" to be the identity function, you
shouldn't use more than 15 significant decimal digits. In your example above,
you have 16 significant digits.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4943
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.