This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/4980] gethostbyname() etc break for /etc/hosts with both ::1 and 127.0.0.1 localhost entries
- From: "tg at mirbsd dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 7 Jul 2008 20:30:03 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/4980] gethostbyname() etc break for /etc/hosts with both ::1 and 127.0.0.1 localhost entries
- References: <20070829170356.4980.pasky@suse.cz>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2008-07-07 20:30 -------
So is this a good representation of the GNU project's style of
development, quality control, etc? I don't know if this has good
PR effects for you.
To an outsider, this looks like:
- I bind to localhost, AF_INET6. Someone tries to contact me via
a symbolic hostname "localhost" and fails because AF_INET is tried
first. (What if both are bound by DIFFERENT programmes?)
- I ask GNU libc for the contents of /etc/hosts, and it lies to me
- This breaks an RFC, deliberately
- without explanation
- the author of the breakage admits "it's fixed in the current
development version" yet claims it's no bug (nÅ?n sequitur!)
Nice style, too: break something, say "we fix it by rewriting the code
soon anyway". Why did you then break it in a released(!) version in the
first place? Does GNU libc not care about preserving compatibility at all?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.