This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug localedata/10501] bn_IN collation does not have canonical equivalence definitions
- From: "santhosh dot thottingal at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 17 Aug 2009 11:40:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/10501] bn_IN collation does not have canonical equivalence definitions
- References: <20090809051246.10501.santhosh.thottingal@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From santhosh dot thottingal at gmail dot com 2009-08-17 11:40 -------
Refer the collation rules of UCA -
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCA/latest/allkeys.txt
[...]
09CB ; [.1B48.0020.0002.09CB] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN O
09C7 09BE ; [.1B48.0020.0002.09CB] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN O
09CC ; [.1B49.0020.0002.09CC] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN AU
09C7 09D7 ; [.1B49.0020.0002.09CC] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN AU
[...]
It is implemented in UCA and should be available in glibc localedata too. ie,
Collation weights of canonically equivalent sequences should be explicitly
defined in glibc and there should not be any assumption on the input to the
collation.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10501
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.