[Bug libc/10571] New: strtol() cutoff range cause premature overflow

["shihjong dot kuo at intel dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

I noticed premature overflow due cutoff range value set in strtol_l.c for long 
string and using a number of base values. strtol() reported overflowed value 
while the string should have been valid. The cutoff values I saw were 
0x55555555_55555555 for base=3, 0x3fffffff_ffffffff for base=4, 
0x33333333_33333333 for base=5, 0x2aaaaaaa_aaaaaaaa for base=6 with glibc 2.9. 
2.10 looks to use the same macro definition for the cutoff table definition.

It seems to me the cutoff value need not be a table with different ranges that 
vary with base value, why not just a simple constant 0x7fffffff_ffffffff for 
all base values?

-- 
           Summary: strtol() cutoff range cause premature overflow
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.9
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: shihjong dot kuo at intel dot com
                CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10571

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.