This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/11828] spurious hi-word part in nl_langinfo on 64bit platform
- From: "samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 22 Jul 2010 09:14:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/11828] spurious hi-word part in nl_langinfo on 64bit platform
- References: <20100722000621.11828.samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 2010-07-22 09:14 -------
"implementation-defined" doesn't mean that the implementation doesn't have do document it. On the contrary, I'd say. That's why I'm again asking for documentation in e.g. the glibc info.
Now, as you say, quick google query. That gives me
mail.gnome.org/archives/hildon-list/2008-August/msg00000.html
langinfo = nl_langinfo(_NL_TIME_WEEK_1STDAY);
week_origin = GPOINTER_TO_INT(langinfo);
as well as http://www.mail-archive.com/rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch/msg03613.html
long week_1stday_l = (long) nl_langinfo (_NL_TIME_WEEK_1STDAY);
Eventually I got to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5486 which boils down to exactly the same thing I'm asking now: please document this glibc-only behavior.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11828
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.