This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug dynamic-link/15006] Libraries in ld.so.cache ignored by ld-linux-armhf.so.3 on armv6l
- From: "steve.mcintyre at linaro dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:46:10 +0000
- Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/15006] Libraries in ld.so.cache ignored by ld-linux-armhf.so.3 on armv6l
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-15006-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15006
--- Comment #5 from Steve McIntyre <steve.mcintyre at linaro dot org> 2013-01-09 15:46:10 UTC ---
> > Hmmmm, that's weird. The ld-linux-armhf.so.3 entry should be saying that it's
> > "libc6" at the very least, and most likely "hard-float", not just "ELF".
> >
> > Also: what's in your ld.so.conf? And have you rebuilt the cache using ldconfig?
> > What's the history of the system - is this newly-built, or upgraded from an
> > older installation?
>
> I just verified the output of ldconfig -p on a working "Raspbian" hard float
> distribution that also prints:
> ld-linux-armhf.so.3 (ELF) => /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
> On my x86 linux it's also ld-linux.so.2 (ELF) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> So I don't think that's it. Could be that ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is a symlink to
> ld-2.17.so which is more of a executable binary than an actual library if I
> understand it correctly?
>
> In my /etc/ld.so.conf is the path you would expect:
> /opt/vc/lib
> And yes, I have rebuilt the cache.
>
> The system is newly-built from scratch, not an upgrade.
OK, so what version of binutils are you using? There are matching changes there
to add the new HF/SF ABI tags.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.