This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug dynamic-link/15006] Libraries in ld.so.cache ignored by ld-linux-armhf.so.3 on armv6l


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15006

--- Comment #5 from Steve McIntyre <steve.mcintyre at linaro dot org> 2013-01-09 15:46:10 UTC ---
> > Hmmmm, that's weird. The ld-linux-armhf.so.3 entry should be saying that it's
> > "libc6" at the very least, and most likely "hard-float", not just "ELF".
> > 
> > Also: what's in your ld.so.conf? And have you rebuilt the cache using ldconfig?
> > What's the history of the system - is this newly-built, or upgraded from an
> > older installation?
> 
> I just verified the output of ldconfig -p on a working "Raspbian" hard float
> distribution that also prints:
> ld-linux-armhf.so.3 (ELF) => /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
> On my x86 linux it's also ld-linux.so.2 (ELF) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> So I don't think that's it. Could be that ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is a symlink to
> ld-2.17.so which is more of a executable binary than an actual library if I
> understand it correctly?
> 
> In my /etc/ld.so.conf is the path you would expect:
> /opt/vc/lib
> And yes, I have rebuilt the cache.
> 
> The system is newly-built from scratch, not an upgrade.

OK, so what version of binutils are you using? There are matching changes there
to add the new HF/SF ABI tags.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]