This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- From: "siddhesh at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 13:27:54 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12515-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12515
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware |siddhesh at redhat dot com
|dot org |
--- Comment #13 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> 2013-05-10 13:27:54 UTC ---
That would be me. It occurred to me that I had assumed that
CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID doesn't start from 0 at process start and I found out
I was wrong. Taking it back, sorry for the noise.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.