This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug ports/15505] ARM glibc missing __aeabi_ctype_table_C and __aeabi_ctype_table_


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15505

--- Comment #3 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> ---
> The point of the CLIBABI symbols (such as the ones in this bug report) is 
> to support .o files that can be used with more than one C library 
> implementation.

This makes no sense to me. Any conforming C library will have the
function named "localeconv". Is the issue the layout of the structure,
i.e. is the CLIBABI defining special functions like this for each
standard library function that has structure-layout, choice-of-type,
etc. issues for the argument or return types? I question whether glibc
or any other libc implementation should bother to support such a
thing, anyway.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]