This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/15524] [DR#437] clock() behaves incorrectly on overflow
- From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:38:17 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/15524] [DR#437] clock() behaves incorrectly on overflow
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-15524-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15524
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Summary|clock() behaves incorrectly |[DR#437] clock() behaves
|on overflow |incorrectly on overflow
--- Comment #1 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
C11 DR#437 is still open, but the currently proposed TC says the return value
should be unspecified on overflow, so allowing existing widespread
implementation practice.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1931.htm#dr_437
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.