This is the mail archive of the
glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc-2.1.X, c++ and libstdc++
- To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
- Subject: Re: glibc-2.1.X, c++ and libstdc++
- From: Mark <mark at mxnet dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 22:34:55 +0000
- References: <19991115112028.D17178@cybercomm.net>
- Reply-To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
If anyone's got the answer to this please let e know also. I've just got
my system back together after this happened to me. I'd kinda like to
avoid it happening again !
Mark
In message <19991115112028.D17178@cybercomm.net>, kutek@cybercomm.net
writes
>
>
>somewhere between glibc 2.1 and 2.1.2 , all my c++ compilers dropped dead.
>(2.7.2.3, 2.7.2.3-stackguard, 2.8.1, egcs 1.1.2) and now c++ 2.95.2,
>for which i cannot get a working version.
>
>thus i tried to recompile libstdc++ for the various gcc versions, but i
>am unable to get a functioning compiler (gcc works fine).when i plug in
>redhat's libstdc++ i can compile working programs...but not produce a
>working libstdc++.
>
>i did apply any patches i could find for libstdc++ ( for libstdc++-2.8.1.1)
>relating to glibc 2.1.X but i still can't compile it ( well, it compiles,
>it just doesn't work)
>
>i assumed that gcc 2.95.2 would contain any fixes for issues related to
>glibc-2.1.X, but c++ and the included libstdc++ do not work. again, the
>C compiler seems to work fine.
>
>how do i know? this simple program (from configure) will compile ok,
>but segfaults when run.
>
>#include "confdefs.h"
>main(){
> return(0);
>
> }
>
>any suggestions?
>
>
>fractoid
>
--
Mark