This is the mail archive of the
glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: 2.2.1 setjmp/tst-setjmp.c: Possible regression from glibc-2.2.0
- To: aj at suse dot de, glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
- Subject: Re: 2.2.1 setjmp/tst-setjmp.c: Possible regression from glibc-2.2.0
- From: Nix <nix at esperi dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: 20 Jan 2001 00:02:58 +0000
- References: <87r9211zbg.fsf@loki.wkstn.nix> <hog0ihb7xy.fsf@gee.suse.de>
- Reply-To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
On 18 Jan 2001, Andreas Jaeger spake:
[my setjmp problems]
>>From glibc CVS:
>
> 2001-01-16 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
> * setjmp/setjmp.h: Cleanup definition of setjmp macro.
>
> * sysdeps/i386/elf/bsd-setjmp.S: Real implementation.
> * sysdeps/i386/elf/bsd-_setjmp.S: Removed.
> * sysdeps/i386/elf/setjmp.S (setjmp): Removed here.
> (_setjmp): Likewise.
> * sysdeps/i386/bsd-_setjmp.S: Real implementation.
> * sysdeps/i386/bsd-setjmp.S: Real implementation.
> * sysdeps/i386/bits/setjmp.h: Remove PUSH_SIGNAL_MASK definition.
> * sysdeps/i386/setjmp.S: Remove PIC support. This is the non-ELF
> version.
>
> It might help,
Indeed it does (after a delay caused by the rolling blackouts rolling
through Sunnyvale and the glibc CVS server, and another delay caused
while I fubar the patching and forget to remove the empty
sysdeps/i386/elf/bsd-_setjmp.S; yes, Nix, setjmp works better when the
code for it is linked into the libc somewhere...)
I'm still wondering if it's even possible to report a bug against the
libc before it is fixed :) Sterling work, thank you.
--
`Anyhow, that pipe dream doesn't say anything about the question you
asked. (I am planning for a career in politics.)' --- Mark Mitchell
on the GCC list