This is the mail archive of the
glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER...
- To: Alex Buell <alex dot buell at tahallah dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER...
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:28:33 +0200
- Cc: Mailing List - glibc <glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107050615510.2828-100000@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
- Reply-To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> - binutils (some 2.11 release) introduced new relocations but nobody
>> considered this relevant to glibc.
>> - We fixed it last week in glibc, feel free to extract the patch from
>> glibc CVS if you need it. glibc 2.2.4 will support these *NEW*
>> relocation types.
>
> I see. Is it safe to revert to 2.10.1 for the time being, that is, compile
> and install 2.10.1 to overwrite 2.11.2?
If you want to use GCC 3.0, you need newer binutils :-(.
Otherwise it should be safe to return to 2.10.1,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj