This is the mail archive of the glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Undefined reference to atexit (FAQ).

To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
Subject: Re: Undefined reference to atexit (FAQ).
From: Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tpeixoto at if dot usp dot br>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:18:06 -0200
References: <20011025135030.68726532.tpeixoto@if.usp.br><87elnrwr27.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix>
Reply-To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu

On 25 Oct 2001 18:46:40 +0100
Nix <nix@esperi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> > I'm using glibc-2.2.4, compiled with gcc-2.95.3.
 
> Recompile glibc with gcc-2.94pre from CVS with this patch applied to
> GCC, and a recent binutils, and it should work properly. (Unless you
> have an alpha; the non-buggy-on-alpha version was posted on the
> libc-alpha mailing list shortly after this one, but I foolishly didn't
> grab it.)

Is there any _stable_ version of gcc that compiles glibc-2.2.4 correctly ?
;-)

Shouldn't gcc-2.95 have that patch applied already ? I mean, 2.95.3 >
2.94pre right ?

Is that bug documented somewhere ?

Thanks.
--

   Tiago

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Undefined reference to atexit (FAQ).
  - From: Nix

References:
- Undefined reference to atexit (FAQ).
  - From: Tiago de Paula Peixoto
- Re: Undefined reference to atexit (FAQ).
  - From: Nix

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]