This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ support

To: GSL discussion list <gsl-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: C++ support
From: Gerard Jungman <jungman at lanl dot gov>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:01:36 -0700
Organization: LANL T-8
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911221726140.14555-100000@higgs.ucdavis.edu> <199911231443.PAA22412@pchem2.chemie.uni-erlangen.de>

Thomas Walter wrote:
>  
> Better and common practice is to protect each header which is enough.

I actually don't know what people prefer. I personally prefer
to protect the includes in my client code explicitly, which
makes it clear that C modules are being imported. I don't think
I really care.

By the way, what happens if you end up with nested extern "C" blocks?
Is this officially ok?

-- 
G. Jungman

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ support
  - From: Thomas Walter

References:
- C++ support
  - From: Jacek Pliszka
- Re: C++ support
  - From: Thomas Walter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]