This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: GSL on OS/2
Brian Gough wrote:
>
> Most of the errors look like small differences but the failures in
> gsl_vector_complex_ and gsl_vector_complex_long_ are unexpected and would be
> worth looking at further to see why they occur.
While trying a few lower optimization levels for gslvector, at -O2 I hit
a SIGSEGV just before the first "FAIL:...correctly" message.
Interesting...
> The monte failures should be fixed by the new versions of those routines that
> are available in CVS.
Everything in monte now passes with the CVS source.
> I've checked in some implementations of acosh, asinh, atanh that should now
> be substituted for missing library functions.
In complex, I got the attached failures at all optimization levels I
tried; they only went away when I reverted to linkage with fdlibm for
acosh and atanh. OTOH, in specfunc I got the attached new failures with
the fdlibm versions, and they went away when I used the ones in gslsys;
just the three legendre failures remain.
h~
complex.fail.gz
specfunc.fail.gz