This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LAPACK vs. GSL matrix algebra

From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
To: Gerard Jungman <jungman at lanl dot gov>
Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:31:57 +0100
Subject: Re: LAPACK vs. GSL matrix algebra
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1040927123018.26477A-100000@yatsen.cas.McMaster.CA><1096308362.2446.67.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov>

Gerard Jungman writes:
 > By the way, I would appreciate any comments from
 > people using an external BLAS with the GSL interfaces.
 > In principle it should be as simple as replacing
 > "-lgslcblas" with "-lmycblas". But I have never
 > heard any complaints or discussion of any kind,
 > which makes me think that nobody is doing
 > it this way.

In the past I run have the test suite with ATLAS as well as GSL CBLAS
and it worked fine.

-- 
Brian Gough

References:
- Re: LAPACK vs. GSL matrix algebra
  - From: kaska
- Re: LAPACK vs. GSL matrix algebra
  - From: Gerard Jungman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]