This is the mail archive of the
guile-emacs@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: special forms (save-excursion)
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <tosi@ees2.oulu.fi> writes:
> Should the macros be in module (emacs import), if they correspond to
> Emacs features?
A new module (emacs macro) might be better.
> If it were possible to pass Scheme procedure objects to Emacs Lisp and
> call them from there, save-excursion could use the existing primitive:
>
> (define-syntax save-excursion
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((save-excursion body ...)
> (emacs-eval `(save-excursion
> (,(lambda ()
> body ...)))))))
Well, in this way, you can't write this:
(let ((start (point)))
(save-excursion
(goto-char start)))
> Here's another version which uses guile-eval instead of directly
> calling the procedure from Emacs. But it too needs the new type.
>
> (define-syntax save-excursion
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((save-excursion body ...)
> (emacs-eval `(save-excursion
> (guile-eval '(',(lambda ()
> body ...))))))))
This looks better in this case. Probably many of Lisp macros can be
implemented this way, except some others such as `unwind-protect'
(but we already have `dynamic-wind'). I guess I should add the new
Lisp type, but... a problem can be we have to convert Scheme's #t
and #f into the special type instead of t and nil. But this may
not be a problem since we can return a symbol t or nil to Lisp anyway.
(And it can be done automatically in some way.)
OK, I'll try to add the type soon. I guess you can define a new
macro `import-lisp-macro'.
> You wrote you'd rename emacs-eval and emacs-apply.
> What are the new names?
New primitives will be:
lisp-eval, lisp-apply, scheme-eval, scheme-apply
New Scheme procedures/macros will be:
lisp-true?, lisp-false?,
lisp-variable-ref, lisp-variable-set!,
import-lisp-function, import-lisp-variable
and perhaps:
define-global-varialbe, define-command
In addition, I could implement import-scheme-procedure or something
for Emacs Lisp.
Hopefully I am releasing the next version within today.