This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
i want to do a loop, i want to have interesting things happen in the loop, but i don't want to save state information each time i recurse. i believe if i do a case statement, inside the loop, and i recurse at the end of each case, that this should be so, but has guile been optimized for this? then rather then typeing out 5 parameters that are the same every time, if i do a "define" statement, to try to simplify my typing, will i use define as a macro, or will i get a dually-recursive system? or is that what define-syntax is for. (by getting into a dually recursive system, i assume that tons of state information would be saved... but i might be wrong) (p.s. it's a big (infinite-like) loop) actually, my standard has define-syntax in it, but guile seems not too, am i useing to liberal of a standard? thanks in advance Corey Sweeney