This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Sascha Ziemann <szi@aibon.ping.de> writes: > Hi, > > when I protect a chunk with a mutex I have to catch all exeptions in > order to unlock the mutex in a case of an exeptions. After this I have > the throw the same exeption again. But then the source of the exeption > is my exeption handler and not the place, where the exeption has been > originally thrown. Is it possible to bypass the orginal thrown > exeption in such a case? Instead of `lock-mutex'/`unlock-mutex' pair, you can use the `with-mutex' macro - it puts the stuff under it in a `dynamic-wind' and takes care of locking and unlocking in the wind guards, so your problem disappears. HTH, mike.