This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Testing dangerous change in tomorrow's snapshot (was: Re: Guile segv)



mcmanr@eq.gs.com writes:
> Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@nada.kth.se> writes:
> 
> > Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@nada.kth.se> writes:
> >
> > Jim suggested the name `(scheme-repl)' instead on the basis that a lot
> > of bindings will be useful only in a repl context.  If no-one has
> > other ideas, I'll change `(user)' to `(scheme-repl)'.
> 
> I use lots of the bindings in ice-9/slib.scm even in embedded applications.
> Besides, common lisp has CL-USER!
> 

I agree that scheme-repl is a bad name, as it will be the package that
users are placed in even in apps that don't have a repl. I'd recommend
(guile-user) on analogy with CL, or just stick with (user).

 - Maciej Stachowiak