This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Greg Badros <gjb@cs.washington.edu> writes: > "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes: > > > Better to stick to the Docbook DTD in my opinion, and produce a more > > general tool to create TeXinfo from the SGML. There is a reason lots > > of people are moving towards using the Docbook based tools. > > I agree completely. Docbook is the way to go. It can't be too hard to > write a db2texi, and that would be far more useful to the world than > hacking our perl/guile scripts to generate another format. That's true; but there are people who would fix the scripts; is there anybody who would write a DocBook to texinfo converter? And in the meantime, we don't get info docs. Don't get me wrong --- I agree with you, I just think that if it's not much work, we should put in a little hack to generate texinfo until somebody does a db2texi converter. Andrew > Greg