This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Chris.Bitmead@misys.com.au writes: > When I said I was planning on building a Motif/Lesstif interface to > Guile, some people suggested that perhaps I should use GTK > instead. I rejected that idea out of hand. My apologies to those > people... Well, I agree that GTK is nice. There is already a sophisticated guile-gtk interface around somewhere, though, so you might want to take a look for it in the usual places, and contribute to that project. > The question now arises for me - whether I should continue to port > Motif to Guile, or whether instead, I should port my applications to > GTK. Motif, for all it's problems, is a standard GUI toolkit for Unix. So I think it is still useful to have a guile interface for Motif (I for one would use it). There is no longer a big problem with Motif being non-free, thanks to Lesstif. > I had always assumed that Motif/Lesstif must be the right thing > partly because having a standard way to make all widgets work > together must be a good thing (Xt) and Motif was a standard. Now I'm > starting to wonder, especially since I noticed Netscape is moving to > GTK. The right thing is a relative thing. Do you want to work on a Motif interface for guile? If so, then it's the Right Thing (tm). Otherwise, I'm sure guile-gtk could use another enthusiastic contributor. -russ -- October. This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to invest in stocks. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August, and February. -- Mark Twain