This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Pseudo-weak?
- To: forcer <forcer at mindless dot com>
- Subject: Re: Pseudo-weak?
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>
- Date: 27 Sep 1999 15:44:32 -0500
- Cc: guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <199909270209.EAA20228@forcix.roof.lan>
> Is it possible to designate function to be called when an object
> isn't referenced anymore except for one (some?) "pseudo-weak"
> locations? E.g. the same behavior as with weak references, except
> that the object does not get garbage collected.
I think this is what guardians are for.