This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Should logior (and friends) operate only on inums?

To: "Greg J. Badros" <gjb at cs dot washington dot edu>
Subject: Re: Should logior (and friends) operate only on inums?
From: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow at alum dot mit dot edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:26:18 -0800
CC: guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001171647520.741-100000@goo.dev.mt.lv> <388385BB.3BC71901@alum.mit.edu> <qrrzou4bdg2.fsf@clavicle.cs.washington.edu>

"Greg J. Badros" wrote:
> 
> It's now back to working on all unsigned longs (I never meant to change
> it).  Bignums were never supported, and I won't be writing that patch
> (and I'm not even convinced that that should be in the core, actually).
> 

BTW, thanks for the fix, it's definitely better than the previous
behavior.

 - Maciej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should logior (and friends) operate only on inums?
  - From: Greg J. Badros

References:
- Should logior (and friends) operate only on inums?
  - From: Janis Dzerins
- Re: Should logior (and friends) operate only on inums?
  - From: Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Should logior (and friends) operate only on inums?
  - From: Greg J. Badros

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]