Re: Trouble understanding define (!)

[Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>]

Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:

> Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
> 
>    [ generic function extension discussion ]
> 
>    The effect is just what we want: instead of shadowing another GF with
>    the same name, there is a new GF created which contain the union of
>    methods.
> 
> Surely this makes it impossible for A:grumble's method set to be
> modified, and that means that A cannot provide a MOP to its users.
> (Which is very bad news if A happens to be (oop goops)!)

Right.

Please see my recent response to Michael L.