Re: Emacs with Guile

[Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>]

Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

> > I understand that your goal may not be to replace the ELisp
> > interpreter,
> 
> Well, it is.  I'm replacing [...]

Actually, my letter was directed to Keisuke Nishida, but I of course
also think the JEmacs project is very interesting.

I wish, though, that people could be better at pooling resources in
order to achieve a great goal.  Now we have at least three parallel
developments of a Scheme Emacs (Guile Emacs, XEmacs, JEmacs).  While
multitude is important for evolution I'm not so sure that it is in
this case...