This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: feature?

To: Michael Livshin <mlivshin at bigfoot dot com>
Subject: Re: feature?
From: Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>
Date: 21 Mar 2000 20:56:07 +0100
Cc: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar at free-expression dot org>, Nicolas Neuss <Nicolas dot Neuss at IWR dot Uni-Heidelberg dot De>, guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se
Cc: djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003202142191.24380-100000@se232.math.indiana.edu> <wspusosmg2.fsf@ortler.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <xy7ln3cl27h.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se> <xy7bt48kxnj.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se> <s3snxkuo5p.fsf@verisity.com> <xy73dpkktpl.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se> <xy7ya7cjelv.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se>

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:

> It seems to be the source properties which melt away during GC.

They melt away because the conses which carry them melt away.  The
conses melt away because the entire stack representation in
*unprotected*!

It should be protected, so this seems to be a newly introduced problem
concerning GC-protection of the tail-array of a struct.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: feature?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

References:
- feature?
  - From: Lynn Winebarger
- Re: feature?
  - From: Nicolas Neuss
- Re: feature?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: feature?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: feature?
  - From: Michael Livshin
- Re: feature?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: feature?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]