This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: [Q] (newbie here) Guile as an extention language.
From: sen_ml@eccosys.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:40:43 +0900
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/wilson/schintro/schintro_17.html#SEC17
says it is. perhaps this is just a bug? or am i missing something?
should i be using a different mode?
what about macros? at least in lisp-interactive-mode, they don't
appear to receive different coloring in my environment. i tried
using `define-syntax' to define a macro but when i used the name of
the macro, i didn't see its color change.
btw, i'm using the scheme-mode that comes w/ emacs version 20.7.2.
ideally emacs would detect `define-syntax' (or regexp "define.*") and
keep a little database of new symbols that are dynamically font-locked.
unfortunately, i've not enough energy at this time to follow through w/
some elisp hacking... [skulks away quietly]
thi