This is the mail archive of the
guile@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Keyword syntax
- To: Marius Vollmer <mvo at zagadka dot ping dot de>
- Subject: Re: Keyword syntax
- From: Frederic Brunel <brunel at mail dot dotcom dot fr>
- Date: 10 Sep 2000 23:57:26 -0100
- Cc: guile at sources dot redhat dot com
- List-Id: <guile-user.gnu.org>
- References: <m28zt2gv80.fsf@mail.dotcom.fr> <87snr857pp.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de> writes:
> Frederic Brunel <brunel@mail.dotcom.fr> writes:
>
> > I think I'm coming a bit too late to debate on language syntax but
> > why keywords must be prefixed by a #?? It's a annoying in comparison
> > with the Common Lisp syntax... In class definition its ugly! :-(
>
> You can use
>
> (read-set! keywords 'prefix)
>
> and after that, you can just write `:keyword' instead of `#:keyword'.
>
> The alternate syntax using `#:' is there to be able to write keywords
> in otherwise R5RS conformant code (which might use `:' in normal
> symbols).
Ok, thank for the info.
I've read the R5RS paper but I don't remember any syntax definition
for keywords, maybe I missed it... I'll look at it!! :-)
It's a good idea to be able to disable this!!
--
;; --------------------------------------------------------------------------
(lambda (what-do-you-want-to-know?) (cdr (assoc what-do-you-want-to-know?
'((name . "Frederic BRUNEL") (www . "http://www.chez.com/brunel/"))
(job . "Software Developer") (uin . "2189048")
(email . "brunel@mail.dotcom.fr") (phone . "0 556 123 750"))))
;; --------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user