This is the mail archive of the
insight@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Insight project.
Re: [RFA] Sorting symbols. Again.
- From: Syd Polk <spolk at apple dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, insight at sources dot redhat dot com, keiths at cygnus dot com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:53:17 -0800
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Sorting symbols. Again.
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 02:37 , Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:01:10PM -0800, Syd Polk wrote:
>
>> You should not have to loop through the objects in list_objv to Incr or
>> Decr their refCounts. Tcl_SetListObj does that automatically. They are
>> created with a refCount of 0; Tcl_SetListObj incrs them to 1. What you
>> are doing is creating them, setting them to 1, calling Tcl_SetListObj
>> (which incrs them to 2), and the decrementing them back to 1.
>>
>> Also, it is really, really slimy to create Tcl_Objs without going
>> through Tcl_New*Obj.
>>
>> I would much prefer that you duplicate the list, and then call "lsort".
>> Pseudo-code:
>>
>> Tcl_Obj *commandArray[2];
>>
>> Tcl_ListObjGetElements (NULL, result_ptr->obj_ptr, &list_objc,
>> &list_objv);
>> newList = Tcl_NewListObj(list_objc, list_objv);
>> commandArray[1] = newList;
>> Tcl_IncrRefCount(newList);
>> commandArray[0] = Tcl_NewObjFromString("lsort");
>> Tcl_IncrRefCount(commandArray[0]);
>> result = Tcl_EvalObjv(interp, 2, commandArray);
>> Tcl_DecrRefCount(commandArray[0]);
>>
>> /* newList now has sorted list. */
>>
>> I am not a maintainer, but I worked in the core of Tcl for a couple of
>> years for John O., and doing block allocates of Tcl_Objs is just asking
>> for trouble, and will lead to problems if insight is ever compiled to
>> TCL_MEM_DEBUG, or other things.
>
> I don't think I did anything of the sort; but perhaps I misunderstood
> Tcl_SetListObj. The documentation doesn't say anything about how to
> allocate the objv. The refcount mess was because of using SetListObj,
> but I suppose I understand now that creating a new object and then
> destroying the old one would have worked out cleaner. Hopefully the
> above will be accepted and I can delete the sort entirely :)
>
+ Tcl_ListObjGetElements (NULL, result_ptr->obj_ptr, &list_objc,
&list_objv);
+ new_objv = (Tcl_Obj **) malloc (sizeof (Tcl_Obj *) * list_objc);
+ memcpy (new_objv, list_objv, sizeof (Tcl_Obj *) * list_objc);
This memcpy duplicates Tcl_Obj's without going through approved API.
This can screw up refcounting of the individual Tcl_Obj's in the list.
> Thanks for the helpful comments.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
>
Syd Polk
QA and Integration Manager, Mac OS X Development Tools
+1 408 974-0577