This is the mail archive of the
insight@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Insight project.
Re: [patch] configure --without-x should work
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 01:27:10PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > --without-x is currently broken (doesn't build), so this is no loss.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > I'd like review from someone who knows something about the whole with-x/
> > without-x thing.
>
> I think this is fine. It makes perfect sense. There is only one really,
> really, really minor point worth mentioning, though: cygwin. On cygwin, it
> is possible to have X but not want to build with it, i.e., use the default
> cygwin builds, which link against Microsoft DLL import libraries.
>
> However, I don't think that any of our configure machinery would work in
> this case, anyway, so it's still no loss. :-)
Well, I was told that if it *does* use our configure machinery, it
uses it with --with-x ! I'd love to understand how *that* works, but
I'd rather put it off until after autoconfiscation.
Soooo, can someone approve me? ;-)
--Nathanael