Re: [patch] REGISTER_RAW_SIZE => DEPRECATED_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE

[David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>]

On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:30:45 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

>> Andrew's latest deprecation missed occurrences in insight.  Andrew,
>> can you please test these patches on a tree containing insight?  And
>> if the insight people were to get around to making it possible to
>> build GDB in a tree containing insight, even if there are compilation
>> problems on the insight side, that would be greatly appreciated as
>> well.

> Don't forget that Insight isn't part of GDB so there's no obligation
> on the part of GDB's FSF maintainers - you included - to keep Insight
> building.

Really?  There's no separate COPYING file, the README doesn't give any
indication that that's the case, and I just looked at the copyright
header for a couple of random files in gdbtk/generic, both of which
assign copyright to the FSF and claim that the file in question is
part of GDB.

Hmm, but digging further, the stuff in library/ has Cygnus/Red Hat
copyright info on it.  That's confusing.

> Perhaphs Red Hat will finally contribute Insight to the FSF?

That would be the easiest way to remove the confusion.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com