This is the mail archive of the
kawa@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Kawa project.
Is this a bug in kawa? I need some help
- To: kawa at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Is this a bug in kawa? I need some help
- From: "Srinithya Krishnan" <srinithyakrishnan at hotmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:05:19 -0000
Hi,
I have a list of procedures that are being loaded from the database into the
environment. The procedures get loaded properly and are available for
execution. For eg:
I have the following procedures loaded from the database:
proc1, proc2
The proc1 is defined as (define (proc1) (proc2)).
The proc2 is not defined yet anywhere in the environment and hence now
executing this should throw an unbound symbol exception which is expected.
Now when the procedure proc 2 is defined in the environment by adding to the
database, it gets available in the environment for that session and also in
the new sessions. The procedure proc2 has been defined as this:
(define (proc2) "xyz")
Therefore the proc1 now outputs xyz
When changes are made to the procedure as (define (proc2) "abc"), this never
gets reflected in proc1. The proc2 outputs abc.
The procedure proc1 still outputs xyz and not abc.
But starting a new session gives the output for the proc1 as abc.
Could anyone help me with this?
Thanks,
Regars,
Srinithya
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.