This is the mail archive of the
kawa@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Kawa project.
RE: bug in compilation
- From: Pinte_Stanislas at emc dot com
- To: per at bothner dot com, Pinte_Stanislas at emc dot com
- Cc: kawa at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 10:24:30 -0400
- Subject: RE: bug in compilation
indeed, with
(define (make-string-event value)
(let ((new-string (make <java.lang.String> value)))
(invoke new-string 'trim)
new-string))
declared in another file, which I
invoque using (require <compiled>)
I have no problems.
I am keeping investigating, sorry.
Stan.
-----Original Message-----
From: Per Bothner [mailto:per@bothner.com]
Sent: dinsdag 28 mei 2002 16:05
To: Pinte_Stanislas@emc.com
Cc: kawa@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: bug in compilation
Pinte_Stanislas@emc.com wrote:
> #|(---:4|# #|(---:5|# #|(---:6|# #|(---:7|# #|(---:8|# #|(---:9|#
> #|(---:10|# #|kawa:11|# java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
> com/filepool/analyzer/script/utils, method: makeEventDaoStatusBig
signature:
>
(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;)
> Expecting to find object/array on stack
I have no idea.
> Here is what the source of the <com.script.scripting> compiled module:
>
> (define (make-event-dao param1 param2 param3)
> (let ((event-dao (make <com.mycompany.Object>)))
> (invoke event-dao 'Work
> param1
> param2
> param3)
> event-dao))
If you can create a standalone test-case, that I can test without
com.mycompany.Object, then I can take a look at it. I.e don't
tell me "com.mycompany.Object is a valid java object" - give me the
source for it.
> It seems that someone met the same here, and it is supposed to be
> fixed...http://sources.redhat.com/ml/kawa/2000/msg00353.html
It probably isn't related.
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/