This is the mail archive of the kawa@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Kawa project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: map-in-order

From: Chris Dean <Chris dot Dean at sokitomi dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: Kawa List <kawa at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:21:53 -0700
Subject: Re: map-in-order
References: <20692.1066434283@mercedsystems.com> <3F9082B1.8060300@bothner.com>

It is redundant, since map behaves in the same manner as map-in-order.

> May we should do: (define map-in-order map)

That's what is commented out!

Here's a patch.

Regards,
Chris Dean

Index: gnu/kawa/slib/srfi1.scm
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/kawa/kawa/gnu/kawa/slib/srfi1.scm,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -w -r1.5 srfi1.scm
--- gnu/kawa/slib/srfi1.scm	1 Jun 2003 05:51:33 -0000	1.5
+++ gnu/kawa/slib/srfi1.scm	18 Oct 2003 00:21:09 -0000
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@
 
 
 ; ;;; We extend MAP to handle arguments of unequal length.
-; (define map map-in-order)	
+(define map map-in-order)	
 ; COMMENTED OUT BY MARCO VEZZOLI FOR KAWA
 
 ;;; filter, remove, partition

Follow-Ups:
- Re: map-in-order
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- map-in-order
  - From: Chris Dean
- Re: map-in-order
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]