This is the mail archive of the kawa@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Kawa project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: macro defining macros

From: Robert Nikander <rob at encodia dot biz>
To: Kawa List <kawa at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:54:03 -0700
Subject: Re: macro defining macros
References: <DB2C825B-8915-42B5-92BB-1403384E7A57@encodia.biz> <42BE1E66.8060402@bothner.com> <42BE5252.6080609@bothner.com>

Cool. I did find a work-around, for my case anyway... use datum- >syntax-object with ... in the datum.

Rob

On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:59 PM, Per Bothner wrote:

Per Bothner wrote:
Robert Nikander wrote:

Is there a way to escape the ellipsis so that you can write a macro that defines a macro? The "standard" is (... ...), but that doesn't appear to work.
Correct - it hasn't been implemented yet.
I suspect it's fairly trivial.
Well, translating (... ...) to ... is trivial.  However, this seems to
trigger other things that aren't quite working, so it's not really
trivial.  I'll look at it more tomorrow.
--
    --Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

References:
- macro defining macros
  - From: Robert Nikander
- Re: macro defining macros
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: macro defining macros
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]