This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
- To: Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
- Subject: Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
- From: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <ragnar@redestb.es>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 19:43:58 +0100 (CET)
- cc: Linux Alpha-Glibc <libc-alpha@cygnus.com>
On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, Alex Buell wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 ragnar@lightside.ddns.org wrote:
>
> > /root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/elf/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path
> > /root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/math:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/elf:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/nss:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/nis:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/db2:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/rt:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/resolv:/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/linuxthreads/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/sunrpc/rpcgen-crpcsvc/bootparam.x-o/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/sunrpc/xbootparam.T
> > make[2]: *** [/root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/build/sunrpc/xbootparam.stmp]
> > Segmentation fault
> > make[2]: Leaving directory /root/comp/glibc-2.0.99/sunrpc'
> > make[1]: *** [sunrpc/others] Error 2
>
> I seem to be getting this problem too. I think I'm going to have to track
> this one down and find out why it's segfaulting.
> Linux tahallah 2.1.126 #59 SMP Sat Oct 24 11:46:13 EDT 1998
I bet my head it's because the binfmt_elf patch in 2.1.126
> This is the first time I've had a major problem with glibc though.
I booted 2.1.125 and it runs fine. And, btw, somewhere in the FAQ should
be a mention that libc.so.5 ldd can give wrong information about the files
in the build.
--
____/| Ragnar Hojland (ragnar@lightside.ddns.org) Fingerprint 94C4B
\ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C
=(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822
U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://keys.pgp.com