This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc-2.0.99 & linux 2.1.125/2.1.126


10/25/98 @ 12:41:15 PM (Sunday)

  Ok, in persuing the less-likely track, here are my tests so far:

	kern-run	kern-hdr	glibc		stat
	2.1.125		2.1.125		2.0.98		OK
	2.1.125		2.1.125		2.0.99		pending #2

	2.1.125		2.1.126		2.0.98		pending #3
	2.1.125		2.1.126		2.0.99		pending #4  (ok?)

	2.1.126		2.1.125		2.0.98		FAIL
	2.1.126		2.1.125		2.0.99		FAIL

	2.1.126		2.1.126		2.0.99		FAIL
	2.1.126		2.1.126		2.0.98		pending next

  I didn't save the email, but it sounds like it can be built under
2.1.125 (running) with 2.1.126 headers.

  ftp.kernel.org has been (mostly) down all weekend and I had grabbed the
full tarball for .126, not the patch.
								--- john
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 14:35:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
To: John Kennedy <jk@csuchico.edu>
cc: alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk, libc-alpha@cygnus.com,
        ragnar@lightside.ddns.org
Subject: Re: glibc-2.0.99 & linux 2.1.125/2.1.126

On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, John Kennedy wrote:

>   Using 2.1.126 and 2.0.99 failed in the now-usual place on my build too.
> Since you're beating that bush, I'll try 2.1.126 & 2.0.98 (given that
> 2.1.125 & 2.0.98 built just fine & worked on my box).

Installing 2.0.99 on 2.1.125 works fine, and rebooted into 2.1.126 and all
seems to be well.
 
> [Ragnar Hojland Espinosa]
> >  ... I bet my head it's because the binfmt_elf patch in 2.1.126
> 
>   I'll have to try to reverse that if/when the 2.1.126+2.0.98 build fails.

This is probably the problem. I'll dig out the patch and eyeball it.

Cheers,
Alex
--
 /\_/\  Legalise cannabis now! 
( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today!
 > ^ <  Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *new* - rewritten for text browser users!

Linux tahallah 2.1.126 #59 SMP Sat Oct 24 11:46:13 EDT 1998
Two Intel Pentium Pro processors, 331.78 total bogomips, 48M RAM
System library 2.0.99


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]