Re: glibc 2.0.111

[Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de>]

On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Dominik Kubla wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 10:46:42AM -0500, Alex Buell wrote:
> > Successfully built and installed glibc-2.0.111 on Linux 2.2.0-final (dual
> > Pentium Pro machine) on my home machine just before I left for work this
> > morning.
> 
> Well, FWIW it failed on Linux 2.2.0-final (+Sparc-Patches) on SparcStation 10
> during linking of libc.so.  The linker complained about "unresolved symbol 
> __vfork"

Ok. The patch some kind soul sent me convinced the sources to compile.  It's
so trivial, i should have found that one myself... Just fix syscalls.list!

But the regression tests failed in math/test-fenv... (see attached output)

> I will give it a try on my UDB with 2.2.0-final over the weekend...

Compilation went fine. But regression tests failed in math/test-float. I
have also attached the test output.

In both cases the C-Compiler was the egcs-1.1.1 release and the 2.2.0-final
kernel (the sparc needed the additional sparc-patches).  

What next? Any suggestions?
  Dominik Kubla

Output of failed regression test on Linux/SPARC 2.2.0-final

Output of failed regression test on Linux/AXP 2.2.0-final