Re: Recommending gcc 2.95.1

[Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk at suse dot de>]

On Sun, Jan 09, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> >>>>> Martin v Loewis writes:
> 
>  > In INSTALL of glibc 2.1.3pre1, the recommended gcc version is
>  > 2.95.1. Should this be updated to 2.95.2, or is there some problem
>  > with 2.95.2?
> It should be updated.

Does anybody know the solution how to compile glibc 2.1.3pre1 on Alpha
with gcc 2.95.2 ?

I always get:
In file included from ../include/bits/cmathcalls.h:1,
                 from ../math/complex.h:88,
                 from ../include/complex.h:1,
                 from conj.c:21:
../math/bits/cmathcalls.h: In function `cimagf':
../math/bits/cmathcalls.h:139: Unable to access imaginary part of complex value in a hard register on this target

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/       kukuk@suse.de
SuSE GmbH            Schanzaeckerstr. 10            90443 Nuernberg
Linux is like a Vorlon.  It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.